gradient.gif (4878 bytes) whiteLOGObleufonce.gif (5083 bytes)
 
 
buttonblueHome.gif (2182 bytes)
buttonblueWelcome.gif (2335 bytes)
buttonwhiteAbout.gif (1997 bytes)
buttonblueEvents.gif (2194 bytes)
buttonblueResearch.gif (2325 bytes)
buttonblueTeaching.gif (2322 bytes)
buttonblueNewsletter.gif (2367 bytes)
buttonblueMembership.gif (2450 bytes)
buttonblueContact.gif (2364 bytes)
buttonblueAMA.gif (2163 bytes)
Inter- and Intra-cultural Research Dilemma
February 2005

A continuing issue in distribution channels research is culture’s influence on relationship constructs such as trust and commitment.  Several theories exist attempting to explain relationship differences because of culture.  One of them is ‘cultural distance’ (e.g., as used by Bello and Gilliland 1997), defined as the extent to which a culture is perceived as different from one’s own.  Additionally, Rao and Schmidt (1998) define “behavioral transparency” as the ability to know and understand each other’s actions.  High cultural distance and low behavioral transparency intuitively suggest significant differences in relationship constructs between firms from distant cultures (inter-cultural relationships).

Studies addressing cultural comparisons of relationship constructs are mixed.  For example, Ha, Karande and Singhapakdi (2004) report no difference in relationship structures between firms from similar or dissimilar cultures.  My own research shows no inter-/intra-cultural difference in trust or commitment between inter- or intra-cultural foreign distributors and US manufacturers. Adler and Graham report only one significant difference in US negotiation behavior despite cultural differences. However, Griffith, Hu and Ryans (2000), while finding no differences intra- and inter-culturally between trust and commitment did find differences in the relationships between commitment and satisfaction and conflict and satisfaction.  Further, Doney, Cannon and Mullen (1998) theorize cultural differences in the development of trust cross-culturally suggesting that relationship constructs are viewed differently depending on inter- or intra-cultural status. 

If as international marketers we want to specify our results by culture, how can we do so if our results are topic or segment dependent?  If we need to identify every variable in our study, is culture too broad an area to use separately? Do we need to specify which area of culture is important (individualism/collectivism or high/low context)?  Can we really use culture as an independent variable?
 

Victor L. Petrovic, Kent State University
References

Adler, Nancy J. and Graham, John L. (1989), “Cross-Cultural Interaction: The International Comparison Fallacy,” Journal of International Business Studies, 20 (3), 515-567. 

Bello, Daniel C. and Gilliland, David I. (1997), “The Effect of Output Controls, Process Controls, and Flexibility on Export Channel Performance,” Journal of Marketing, 61 (1), 22-38. 

Doney, Patricia, M., Joseph P. Cannin and MichaelR. Mullen (1998), "Understanding the Influence of National Culture on the Development of Trust," Academy of Management REview," 23(3), 601-620.

Griffith, David A.; Hu, Michael Y. and Ryans, John K. Jr. (2000), “Process Standardization across Intra- and Inter-Cultural Relationships,” Journal of International Business Studies, 31 (2), 303-324. ^

Ha, Jungbok, Karande, Kiran and Singhapakdi, Anusorn (2004), “Importers’ Relationships With Exporters: Does Culture Matter,” International Marketing Review, 21 (4/5), 447-461. 

Rao, Asha and Schmidt, Stuart M. (“A Behavioral Perspective on Negotiating International Alliances,” Journal of International Business Studies, 29 (4), 665-693. 

 
.