gradient.gif (4878 bytes) whiteLOGObleufonce.gif (5083 bytes)
 
 
buttonblueHome.gif (2182 bytes)
buttonblueWelcome.gif (2335 bytes)
buttonwhiteAbout.gif (1997 bytes)
buttonblueEvents.gif (2194 bytes)
buttonblueResearch.gif (2325 bytes)
buttonblueTeaching.gif (2322 bytes)
buttonblueNewsletter.gif (2367 bytes)
buttonblueMembership.gif (2450 bytes)
buttonblueContact.gif (2364 bytes)
buttonblueAMA.gif (2163 bytes)
Privacy Concepts and Consumers' Willingness to Share Personal Information via the Internet
February 2002

More and more we are reading about issues and concerns that have arisen from our lives and work in an increasingly technological age.  It seems all of us—from the popular press, to local, state, and federal governments, to academic researchers and scholars—are struggling to find our way through the complexities created by the so-called “new economy.”  Despite the numerous and varied issues and concerns, however, there seems to be a convergence of attention from these diverse points of interest on privacy, to include privacy concerns among online consumers, consumers’ willingness to provide personal information, issues related to the availability of personal information on electronic databases, and the use of personal information gathered by businesses and government, as well as other individual consumers, via the Internet.  To no one’s surprise, much of this attention has spurred discussion and debate about regulatory requirements and raised concerns over our ability to control the management (or mismanagement) of information. 

While the academic literature and the popular press have recognized the importance of privacy concerns as they relate to consumers’ use of the Internet, a single, uniform concept of privacy has not been adopted.  As a matter of fact, a review of the literature suggests considerable confusion regarding our understanding and application of the concept.  For example, findings from a comprehensive and detailed analysis of recent publications by academic scholars, the press, business and legal practitioners, among others revealed that the terms “privacy” and “security” are frequently used synonymously.  This realization led to a more thorough examination of the use of the terms (i.e., privacy and security) and resulted in the identification of two related concepts, namely confidentiality and anonymity in relation to the concepts of privacy and security. 

CONFIDENTIALITY
· The personal information you provide is held in confidence by the company and not shared with others.
ANONYMITY
· Your online activity is not linked in any way to your name or other identifying information.
PRIVACY
· Your interests and activities remain private and you are not subjected to unsolicited information or requests by businesses.
SECURITY
· There are precautions taken by the company to ensure that your personal information is secured and protected from others and unintended uses.

Considering the distinctions drawn by the definitions above, it should not be surprising to discover differences in the nature and strength of Internet users’ attitudes toward the use of personal data—both in-country and internationally.  Exploring both differences and similarities may help us evaluate the future potential of E-Commerce in different countries and regions of the world.

 
Pamela Kiecker, Virginia Commonwealth University